United States v. Cleveland Indians Baseball Co.
2001 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about United States v. Cleveland Indians Baseball Co.?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
United States v. Cleveland Indians Baseball Company, 532 U.S. 200 (2001), is a United States Supreme Court case that deals with the federal tax code. The question before the court was “Is back-pay subject to federal taxes under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act and the Federal Unemployment Tax Act, based on the year the money should have been paid out?” The court held that wages are to be taxed on the year they were actually paid.[1] Carter G. Phillips argued for the respondent and James A. Feldman argued for the petitioner, the Department of Justice.
Quick Facts United States v. Cleveland Indians Baseball Company, Argued February 27, 2001 Decided April 17, 2001 ...
United States v. Cleveland Indians Baseball Company | |
---|---|
Argued February 27, 2001 Decided April 17, 2001 | |
Full case name | United States v. Cleveland Indians Baseball Company |
Docket no. | 00-203 |
Citations | 532 U.S. 200 (more) 121 S. Ct. 1433; 149 L. Ed. 2d 401; 2001 U.S. LEXIS 3203 |
Case history | |
Prior | Cleveland Indians Baseball Co. v. United States, No. 1:96-CV-2240, 1999 WL 72866 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 25, 1999); affirmed, 215 F.3d 1325 (6th Cir. 2000); cert. granted, 531 U.S. 943 (2000). |
Holding | |
Wages are to be taxed on the year they were actually paid. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Ginsburg, joined by Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Breyer |
Concurrence | Scalia |
Laws applied | |
26 U.S.C. §§ 3111(a), 3301 |
Close