United States v. Alcoa
American legal case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about United States v. Alcoa?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
United States v. Alcoa, 148 F.2d 416 (2d Cir. 1945),[1] is a landmark decision concerning United States antitrust law. Judge Learned Hand's opinion is notable for its discussion of determining the relevant market for market share analysis and—more importantly—its discussion of the circumstances under which a monopoly is guilty of monopolization under section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. (January 2015) |
Quick Facts United States v. Alcoa, Court ...
United States v. Alcoa | |
---|---|
Court | United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit |
Full case name | United States v. Aluminum Co. of America |
Decided | March 12, 1945 |
Citation(s) | 148 F.2d 416 |
Court membership | |
Judge(s) sitting | Learned Hand, Thomas Walter Swan, Augustus Noble Hand |
Case opinions | |
Majority | L. Hand, joined by a unanimous court |
Laws applied | |
Sherman Antitrust Act |
Close