Standard Bank v Saunderson
South African legal case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Standard Bank v Saunderson?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd v Saunderson and Others is an important case in South African property law and civil procedure. It was heard in the Supreme Court of Appeal on 23 November 2005 and decided on 15 December 2005. In a unanimous judgment written by Judges of Appeal Edwin Cameron and Robert Nugent, the court dealt with the proper application of Jaftha v Schoeman.[1]
Quick Facts Standard Bank v Saunderson, Court ...
Standard Bank v Saunderson | |
---|---|
Court | Supreme Court of Appeal (South Africa) |
Full case name | Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd v Saunderson and Others |
Decided | 15 December 2005 |
Docket nos. | 358/05 |
Citation(s) | [2005] ZASCA 131; [2006] 2 All SA 382 (SCA); 2006 (9) BCLR 1022 (SCA); 2006 (2) SA 264 (SCA) |
Case history | |
Appealed from | High Court of South Africa, Cape of Good Hope Provincial Division – Standard Bank of South Africa Limited v Snyders and Others [2005] ZAWCHC 51 |
Appealed to | Constitutional Court of South Africa – Campus Law Clinic (University of KwaZulu-Natal Durban) v Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd and Another [2006] ZACC 5 |
Court membership | |
Judges sitting | Howie P, Cameron JA, Nugent JA, Jafta JA and Mlambo JA |
Case opinions | |
Decision by | Cameron and Nugent JJA (unanimous) |
Close