Shapiro v. Thompson
1969 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Shapiro v. Thompson?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that invalidated state durational residency requirements for public assistance and helped establish a fundamental 'right to travel' in U.S. law. It was a part of a set of three welfare cases, Harrell v. Tobriner and Smith v. Reynolds all heard during the 1968-1969 period by the Supreme Court. Shapiro v. Thompson, King v. Smith and Goldberg v. Kelly were a set of successful Supreme Court cases that dealt with welfare, specifically referred to as a part of 'The Welfare Cases'.[1]
Shapiro v. Thompson | |
---|---|
Argued May 1, 1968 Reargued October 23–24, 1968 Decided April 21, 1969 | |
Full case name | Shapiro v. Thompson |
Citations | 394 U.S. 618 (more) 89 S. Ct. 1322; 22 L. Ed. 2d 600; 1969 U.S. LEXIS 3190 |
Argument | Oral argument |
Case history | |
Prior | |
Holding | |
The fundamental right to travel and the Equal protection clause forbid a state from reserving welfare benefits only for persons that have resided in the state for at least a year. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Brennan, joined by Douglas, Stewart, White, Fortas, Marshall |
Concurrence | Stewart |
Dissent | Warren, joined by Black |
Dissent | Harlan |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amends. I, XIV |
Shapiro v. Thompson was not about the issue of welfare per se, but rather about the restrictions to the right to travel and possible violations of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. The question posed by Shapiro v. Thompson was whether Congress, in writing Section 602(b) of the Social Security Act, overstepped its regulating powers by giving states the ability to restrict travel.[2] Although the Constitution does not explicitly mention the right to travel, it is implied by the other rights given in the Constitution.[3][4] In 1969, 43 states had a residency requirement in effect, declared unconstitutional by the Shapiro v. Thompson decision.[1] Within those 43 states, it is estimated by the court that at least 100,000 people - minimum - were unable to get welfare aid. By 1970, there was a 17% increase in those nationally receiving AFDC aid due to the Shapiro decision.[5]: 87–89