Roncarelli v Duplessis
Supreme Court of Canada case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Roncarelli v Duplessis?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
Roncarelli v. Duplessis, [1959] S.C.R. 121,[1] was a landmark constitutional decision of the Supreme Court of Canada. The court held that in 1946 Maurice Duplessis, both Premier and Attorney General of Quebec, had overstepped his authority by ordering the manager of the Liquor Commission to revoke the liquor licence of Frank Roncarelli, a Montreal restaurant owner and Jehovah's Witness who was an outspoken critic of the Roman Catholic Church in Quebec. Roncarelli provided bail for Jehovah's Witnesses arrested for distributing pamphlets attacking the Roman Catholic Church. The Supreme Court found Duplessis personally liable for $33,123.56 in damages plus Roncarelli's court costs.[2]
Roncarelli v. Duplessis | |
---|---|
Hearing: June 2–6, 1958 Judgment: January 27, 1959 | |
Full case name | Frank Roncarelli v. The Honourable Maurice Duplessis |
Citations | [1959] S.C.R. 121 |
Ruling | Trial judge correct, amount awarded at trial increased by $25,000. |
Court membership | |
Chief Justice: Patrick Kerwin Puisne Justices: Robert Taschereau, Ivan Rand, Charles Holland Locke, John Robert Cartwright, Gerald Fauteux, Douglas Abbott, Ronald Martland, Wilfred Judson | |
Reasons given | |
Majority | Martland J., joined by Locke J. |
Concurrence | Kerwin C.J. |
Concurrence | Rand J., joined by Judson J. |
Concurrence | Abbott J. |
Dissent | Taschereau J. |
Dissent | Cartwright J. |
Dissent | Fauteux J. |
A significant decision on civil liberties in the pre-Charter era, Roncarelli became known as one of the central cases in the constitutional theory later called the "Implied Bill of Rights."[3][4] Justice Morris Fish would describe it as "Canada's most important decision on the rule of law."[5]