Rodriguez v. FDIC
2020 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Rodriguez v. FDIC?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Rodriguez v. FDIC was a United States Supreme Court case (589 U.S. ____ (2020)) in which the court held that the Bob Richards rule was not appropriately crafted and federal judges should not apply it when resolving disputes about tax allocations to members of an affiliated group filing a consolidated return.[1][2]
Quick Facts Rodriguez v. FDIC, Argued December 3, 2019 Decided February 25, 2020 ...
Rodriguez v. FDIC | |
---|---|
Argued December 3, 2019 Decided February 25, 2020 | |
Full case name | Rodriguez, as chapter 7 trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of United Western Bancorp, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as receiver for United Western Bank |
Docket no. | 18-1269 |
Citations | 589 U.S. (more) |
Argument | Oral argument |
Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
Case history | |
Prior | 473 F.2d 262 |
Holding | |
473 F.2d 262 (The Bob Richards Rule) is not a legitimate exercise of federal common lawmaking, 914 F.3d 1262 vacated and remanded | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Gorsuch, joined by a unanimous court |
Close