Reeves, Inc. v. Stake
1980 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Reeves, Inc. v. Stake?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Reeves, Inc. v. Stake, 447 U.S. 429 (1980), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that individual states, when acting as producers or suppliers rather than as market regulators, may discriminate preferentially against out-of-state residents.[1][2] This "market participant" doctrine is an exception to the so-called negative commerce clause, which ordinarily deems state regulations invalid where they discriminate against interstate commerce in favor of intrastate commerce for the purpose of economic protectionism.
Quick Facts Reeves, Inc. v. Stake, Argued April 16, 1980 Decided June 19, 1980 ...
Reeves, Inc. v. Stake | |
---|---|
Argued April 16, 1980 Decided June 19, 1980 | |
Full case name | Reeves, Inc. v. Stake, et al. |
Citations | 447 U.S. 429 (more) 100 S. Ct. 2271; 65 L. Ed. 2d 244; 1980 U.S. LEXIS 40 |
Case history | |
Prior | Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit |
Holding | |
South Dakota's preferential treatment of South Dakota residents in its sale of state-produced cement is not a violation of the negative commerce clause. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Blackmun, joined by Burger, Stewart, Marshall, Rehnquist |
Dissent | Powell, joined by Brennan, White, Stevens |
Close