R v Keegstra
1990 Supreme Court of Canada case on hate speech / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about R v Keegstra?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
R v Keegstra, [1990] 3 SCR 697 is a freedom of expression decision of the Supreme Court of Canada where the court upheld the Criminal Code provision prohibiting the wilful promotion of hatred against an identifiable group as constitutional under the freedom of expression provision in section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It is a companion case to R v Andrews.
Quick Facts R v Keegstra, Hearing: December 5, 6, 1989 Judgment: December 13, 1990 ...
R v Keegstra | |
---|---|
Hearing: December 5, 6, 1989 Judgment: December 13, 1990 | |
Full case name | Her Majesty The Queen v James Keegstra |
Citations | [1990] 3 SCR 697 |
Docket No. | 21118 [1] |
Prior history | R. v. Keegstra, 1988 ABCA 234; R. v. Keegstra, 1984 CanLII 1313 (AB KB). |
Ruling | Crown appeal allowed; constitutionality of s. 319 of the Criminal Code upheld. |
Holding | |
s.319(3)(a) of the Criminal Code infringe on section 2(b) rights of freedom on expression, but is justified under section 1 of the Charter. | |
Court membership | |
Chief Justice: Brian Dickson Puisne Justices: Antonio Lamer, Bertha Wilson, Gérard La Forest, Claire L'Heureux-Dubé, John Sopinka, Charles Gonthier, Peter Cory, Beverley McLachlin | |
Reasons given | |
Majority | Dickson CJ, joined by Wilson, L'Heureux-Dubé, and Gonthier JJ |
Dissent | McLachlin J, joined by Sopinka and La Forest JJ |
Lamer and Cory JJ took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Laws applied | |
Irwin Toy Ltd v Quebec (AG) (1989); R v Whyte (1988); R v Oakes (1986); R v Morgentaler (1988); Rocket v Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario (1990) |
Close