R v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; Ex parte BHP
Judgement of the High Court of Australia / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about R v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; Ex parte BHP?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
R v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; Ex parte BHP,[1] was an early decision of the High Court of Australia concerning the jurisdiction of the Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration in which the High Court controversially,[2] granted prohibition against the Arbitration Court to prevent it from enforcing aspects of an industrial award. The High Court held that the Arbitration Court had gone beyond settling the dispute that had been submitted to it and in doing so had made a jurisdictional error.
Quick Facts R v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; Ex parte BHP, Court ...
R v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; Ex parte BHP | |
---|---|
Court | High Court of Australia |
Full case name | The King v the Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration. Ex parte the Broken Hill Proprietary Company Limited; the Commonwealth of Australia intervening. |
Decided | 23 April 1909 |
Citation(s) | [1909] HCA 20, (1909) 8 CLR 419 |
Case history | |
Prior action(s) | Barrier Branch of the Amalgamated Miners' Association of Broken Hill v Broken Hill Proprietary Co (1909) 3 CAR 1 per Higgins President. |
Court membership | |
Judge(s) sitting | Griffith CJ, O'Connor & Isaacs JJ |
Close