Oregon v. Elstad
1985 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Oregon v. Elstad?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298 (1985), was a landmark Supreme Court of the United States case relating to Miranda warnings.[1]
Quick Facts Oregon v. Elstad, Argued October 3, 1984 Decided March 4, 1985 ...
Oregon v. Elstad | |
---|---|
Argued October 3, 1984 Decided March 4, 1985 | |
Full case name | Oregon, Petitioner v. Michael James Elstad |
Citations | 470 U.S. 298 (more) 105 S. Ct. 1285; 84 L. Ed. 2d 222 |
Case history | |
Prior | Conviction reversed, State v. Elstad, 61 Or. App. 673, 658 P.2d 552 (1983); cert. granted, 465 U.S. 1078 (1984). |
Subsequent | Conviction affirmed on remand, State v. Elstad, 78 Or. App. 362, 717 P.2d 174 (1986). |
Holding | |
The Self-Incrimination Clause of the Fifth Amendment does not require the suppression of a confession, made after proper Miranda warnings and a valid waiver of rights, solely because the police had obtained an earlier voluntary but unwarned admission from the suspect. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | O'Connor, joined by Burger, White, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist |
Dissent | Brennan, joined by Marshall |
Dissent | Stevens |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amends. V, XIV |
Close