Norberg v Wynrib
Supreme Court of Canada case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Norberg v Wynrib?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Norberg v Wynrib, [1992] 2 SCR 226 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the fiduciary duty between doctors and patients, and on the limits of consent as a defence in sexual assault.
Quick Facts Norberg v Wynrib, Hearing: Judgment: ...
Norberg v Wynrib | |
---|---|
Hearing: Judgment: | |
Full case name | Laura Norberg v Morris Wynrib |
Citations | [1992] 2 SCR 226 |
Docket No. | 21924 [1] |
Court membership | |
Chief Justice: Antonio Lamer Puisne Justices: Gérard La Forest, Claire L'Heureux-Dubé, John Sopinka, Charles Gonthier, Peter Cory, Beverley McLachlin, William Stevenson, Frank Iacobucci | |
Reasons given | |
Majority | La Forest J |
Close