Network Automation, Inc. v. Advanced Systems Concepts, Inc.
Court case decided on March 8, 2011 / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Network Automation, Inc. v. Advanced Systems Concepts, Inc.?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
Network Automation, Inc. v. Advanced Systems Concepts, Inc., 638 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. 2011) was a court case decided on March 8, 2011, where the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that the use of a competitor's trademark as an Internet search advertising keyword did not constitute trademark infringement. In the case, Network Automation advertised their own competing product in search queries that contained Advanced Systems Concepts' "ActiveBatch" trademark. In determining whether trademark infringement occurred, the court evaluated factors relevant to the likelihood of customer confusion outlined in AMF Inc. v. Sleekcraft Boats[1] and concluded that confusion was unlikely.[2]
Network Automation, Inc. v. Advanced Systems Concepts, Inc. | |
---|---|
Court | United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
Full case name | Network Automation, Inc. v. Advanced Systems Concepts, Inc. |
Decided | March 8, 2011 |
Court membership | |
Judge(s) sitting | Stephen S. Trott, Kim McLane Wardlaw, & Michael W. Mosman. |