Nader v. Brewer
Court decision regarding Arizona voting regulations / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Nader v. Brewer?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Nader v. Brewer, 531 F.3d 1028 (9th Cir. 2008)[1] is a 2008 decision by the Ninth Circuit ruling that certain Arizona voting regulations were unconstitutional under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
The examples and perspective in this article may not include all significant viewpoints. (March 2009) |
Quick Facts Nader v. Brewer, Court ...
Nader v. Brewer | |
---|---|
Court | United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
Full case name | Ralph Nader; Donald N. Daien v. Janice Brewer |
Argued | April 15, 2008 |
Decided | July 9, 2008 |
Citation(s) | 531 F.3d 1028 |
Case history | |
Prior history | Plaintiffs' summary judgment granted by district court, June 9, 2006 |
Subsequent history | Cert. denied, March 9, 2009 |
Court membership | |
Judge(s) sitting | Mary M. Schroeder, Richard R. Clifton, Consuelo M. Callahan |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Schroeder, joined by a unanimous court |
Laws applied | |
First Amendment |
Close
The original lawsuit was filed by Robert Barnes on behalf of Ralph Nader, Peter Camejo, Donald N. Daien, and Kendle H. Greenlee against Jan Brewer in her official capacity as Secretary of State of Arizona.
The Supreme Court of the United States declined to hear an appeal on March 9, 2009.[2]