Monotonicity criterion
Property of electoral systems / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Monotonicity criterion?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
The monotonicity criterion, also called positive response[1] or positive vote weight,[2] is a principle of social choice theory that says that increasing a candidate's ranking or rating should not cause them to lose.[3] Positive response rules out cases where a candidate loses an election as a result of receiving too much support from voters (i.e. being "too popular to win").
Systems that violate positive response (such as instant-runoff) can create situations where a ballot has the opposite effect of what the voter intended. This runs counter to the intuition that increasing an option's popularity in a democratic election should only improve the chances of that option winning. As a result, German courts have previously struck down nonmonotonic systems for violating the right to equal and direct suffrage.[4][5]
Most voting systems (including Borda and all common tournament solutions) satisfy monotonicity,[3] as do all commonly-used rated voting methods (including approval and score).[note 1]
However, the criterion is violated by instant-runoff voting,[6] the single transferable vote, and Hamilton's apportionment method.[2]
The participation criterion is a closely-related, but different, concept. While positive responsiveness deals with a voter changing their opinion (or vote), participation deals with situations where a voter choosing to cast a ballot can have a reversed effect on the election.