Main Currents of Marxism
1976 book by Leszek Kołakowski / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Main Currents of Marxism?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
Main Currents of Marxism: Its Origins, Growth and Dissolution (Polish: Główne nurty marksizmu. Powstanie, rozwój, rozkład) is a work about Marxism by the political philosopher Leszek Kołakowski.[1] Its three volumes in English are The Founders, The Golden Age, and The Breakdown. It was first published in Polish in Paris in 1976, with the English translation appearing in 1978. In 2005, Main Currents of Marxism was republished in a one volume edition, with a new preface and epilogue by Kołakowski. The work was intended to be a "handbook" on Marxism by Kołakowski, who was once an orthodox Marxist but ultimately rejected Marxism. Despite his critical stand toward Marxism, Kołakowski endorsed the philosopher György Lukács's interpretation of the philosopher Karl Marx.
Author | Leszek Kołakowski |
---|---|
Original title | Główne nurty marksizmu. Powstanie, rozwój, rozkład |
Translator | P. S. Falla |
Country | France |
Language | Polish |
Subject | Marxism |
Published |
|
Media type | Print (hardcover and paperback) |
Pages | 434 (English ed., vol. 1) 542 (English ed., vol. 2) 548 (English ed., vol. 3) 1284 (one volume edition) |
ISBN | 0-19-285107-1 (vol. 1) 0-19-285108-X (vol. 2) 0-19-285109-8 (vol. 3) 978-0393329438 (one volume edition) |
The book received many positive reviews, praising Kołakowski for his discussion of Marxism in general, as well as historical materialism, Lukács, Polish Marxism, Leon Trotsky, Herbert Marcuse, and the Frankfurt School in particular. Kołakowski was also praised for the quality of his writing. Other reviewers were more critical of his treatment of the Frankfurt School. Reviewers were divided in their evaluations of his treatment of Karl Kautsky, Vladimir Lenin, and Antonio Gramsci. Kołakowski was criticized for omitting discussions of particular authors or topics, his hostility to Marxism, his adherence to Lukács's interpretation of Marx, his failure to explain Marxism's appeal, and for giving a misleading impression of Marxism by focusing on Marxist philosophers at the expense of other Marxist writers.