Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding
1953 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding, 344 U.S. 590 (1953), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a lawful permanent resident, who departs from and returns to the country as a seaman on an American ship, retains procedural due process rights and cannot be deported under 8 CFR § 175.57(b) without a hearing.[1][2]
Quick Facts Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding, Argued October 17, 1952 Decided February 9, 1953 ...
Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding | |
---|---|
Argued October 17, 1952 Decided February 9, 1953 | |
Full case name | Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding et al. The Sir John Franklin. |
Docket no. | 17 |
Citations | 344 U.S. 590 (more) 73 S. Ct. 472; 97 L. Ed. 2d 576; 1953 U.S. LEXIS 2554 |
Case history | |
Prior | 192 F.2d 1009 (2d Cir. 1951) |
Holding | |
A lawful permanent resident, who departs from and returns to the country as a seaman on an American ship, retains procedural due process rights and cannot be deported under 8 CFR § 175.57(b) without a hearing. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Burton, joined by Black, Reed, Frankfurter, Douglas, Jackson, Vinson, Clark |
Dissent | Minton |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. V, 8 CFR 175.57 |
Close