Kawashima v. Holder
2012 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Kawashima v. Holder?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Kawashima v. Holder, 565 U.S. 478 (2012), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that "filing a false tax return in violation of 26 U.S.C. Section 7206 qualifies as an aggravated felony under the Immigration and Nationality Act when the Government's revenue loss exceeds $10,000."[3][4]
Quick Facts Kawashima v. Holder, Argued November 7, 2011 Decided February 21, 2012 ...
Kawashima v. Holder | |
---|---|
Argued November 7, 2011 Decided February 21, 2012 | |
Full case name | Akio Kawashima, et ux., Petitioners v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General |
Docket no. | 10-577 |
Citations | 565 U.S. 478 (more) 132 S. Ct. 1166; 182 L. Ed. 2d 1; 2012 U.S. LEXIS 1084; 80 U.S.L.W. 4147 |
Argument | Oral argument |
Case history | |
Prior | Appeal of deportation order denied (Bd. Immigr. App., 200?); reversed in part sub nom. Kawashima v. Gonzales, 503 F.3d 997 (9th Cir. 2007, withdrawn); reconsidered[1] and fully reversed sub nom. Kawashima v. Mukasey, 530 F.3d 1111 (9th Cir. 2008, withdrawn); reconsidered[2] anew and affirmed 615 F.3d 1043 (9th Cir. 2010); certiorari granted, 563 U.S. 1007 (2011). |
Holding | |
"Filing a false tax return in violation of 26 U.S.C. Section 7206 qualifies as an aggravated felony under the Immigration and Nationality Act when the Government's revenue loss exceeds $10,000."[3] Ninth Circuit affirmed. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Thomas, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Alito, Sotomayor |
Dissent | Ginsburg, joined by Breyer, Kagan |
Close