Karcher v. May
1987 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Karcher v. May?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Karcher v. May, 484 U.S. 72 (1987), was a school prayer case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the former presiding officers of the New Jersey legislature did not have Article III standing to appeal a case, as that standing had passed on to their legislative successors.[1]
Quick Facts Karcher v. May, Argued October 6, 1987 Decided December 1, 1987 ...
Karcher v. May | |
---|---|
Argued October 6, 1987 Decided December 1, 1987 | |
Full case name | Karcher, Speaker of the New Jersey General Assembly, et al. v. May et al |
Docket no. | 85-1551 |
Citations | 484 U.S. 72 (more) 108 S. Ct. 388; 98 L. Ed. 2d 327; 1987 U.S. LEXIS 5027 |
Case history | |
Prior | May v. Cooperman, 572 F. Supp. 1561 (D.N.J. 1983); on reconsideration, 578 F. Supp. 1308 (D.N.J. 1984); affirmed, 780 F.2d 240 (3d Cir. 1985). |
Holding | |
Appellants intervened and participated throughout this lawsuit only in their official capacities as presiding officers on behalf of the state legislature. They no longer hold those offices, and the authority to pursue the lawsuit on behalf of the legislature has passed to their successors under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(1). | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | O'Connor, joined by Rehnquist, Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens, Scalia |
Concurrence | White |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. Art. III, Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(1) |
Close