Janetka v. Dabe
American legal case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Janetka v. Dabe?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
In Janetka v. Dabe, 892 F.2d 187 (2d Cir. 1989),[1] the Second Circuit considered whether, under New York law, a plaintiff could satisfy the element of "favorable termination" requisite to a malicious prosecution claim when he had been acquitted on a misdemeanor charge (resisting arrest) but convicted of a less serious charge (disorderly conduct, a violation).[1]
Quick Facts Janetka v. Dabe, Court ...
Janetka v. Dabe | |
---|---|
Court | United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit |
Full case name | Janetka v. Dabe |
Argued | November 2, 1989 |
Decided | December 15, 1989 |
Citation(s) | 892 F.2d 187; 29 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 612 |
Court membership | |
Judge(s) sitting | Roger Miner, John Daniel Mahoney, Gregory W. Carman (Ct. Int. Trade) |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Miner, joined by a unanimous court |
Close