Notable ideas |
-
The Project of Autonomy,[17]
the radical imaginary[18] underlying social institutions,[19] radical imagination,[20] the social imaginary,[21] social imaginary significations,[22] proto-representation (Ur-Vorstellung),[23] the monadic core of the psyche,[24] "the unconscious exists only as an indissociably representative/affective/intentional flux,"[25] rejecting the reduction of representation to perception,[26] "the first delegation of the drive in the psyche is the affect,"[27] the psyche and the anonymous collective are irreducible to each other,[28] sublimation as the process by means of which the psyche is forced to replace its private objects of cathexis with objects that have value through their social institution,[29] social fabrication of the individual,[30] social constructionism,[31][32] lability of investments (labilité des investissements),[33] identifying representational activity as prior to reflection,[34] being-in-itself as creative of its own proper world,[35] idiogenesis/koinogenesis,[36] the world as a product of Chaos,[37] ontological magma,[38] identitary-ensemblist logic (logique ensembliste-identitaire),[39] the Cantorian definition of 'set' implies the schema of separation,[40] proto-institutions of legein and teukhein,[39][41] Wo Ich bin, soll Es auftauchen ("Where Ego is, Id must spring forth"),[42] conflict of desires,[36] the Social-Historical,[43] the methodology of elucidation (élucidation),[44] circle of creation,[45] the paradox of history,[46] society's leaning on the first natural stratum,[47] "creation is ex nihilo, but it is neither in nihilo nor cum nihilo,"[48] vis formandi,[49] radical alterity (altérité radicale),[50] time as creation/destruction of forms,[51] societas instituans/societas instituta,[52] abolition of the wage system,[53][54] administration of justice by popular tribunals,[55] plan factory,[56] democratic planning,[57] totalitarian (Soviet) vs. fragmented (Western) bureaucratic capitalism,[58] the "final contradiction" of capitalism,[59] relatively autonomous evolution of technique,[60] liberal oligarchy,[61] pseudo-rational mastery,[62] the nomos–physis distinction,[63] three spheres of social action (oikos, the private/private or domestic sphere; agora, the public/private or implicitly political sphere; ekklesia, the public/public or explicitly political sphere),[64][65] ecological self-limitation (degrowth),[66][67] Gödelian argument,[68][69] the Greco-Occidental particuliarity,[70][71] democracy as procedure (formalist) vs. democracy as regime (substantivist),[72] criticism of structuralism (logicism) and functionalism (physicalism),[73] criticism of spiritualist and materialist dialectic,[74] criticism of Marxian economics,[75][76] capital as power,[54][77][78] criticism of Marx's theory of history,[79] criticism of Lacanianism,[80] criticism of the poststructuralist theory of the subject,[81] criticism of the New Philosophers[82][83]
|
---|