Commonwealth v Tasmania
1983 Australian constitutional law case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Commonwealth v Tasmania?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
For the 1904 case, see Tasmania v Commonwealth of Australia and Victoria (1904).
Commonwealth v Tasmania (popularly known as the Tasmanian Dam Case)[1] was a significant Australian court case, decided in the High Court of Australia on 1 July 1983. The case was a landmark decision in Australian constitutional law, and was a significant moment in the history of conservation in Australia. The case centred on the proposed construction of a hydro-electric dam on the Gordon River in Tasmania, which was supported by the Tasmanian government, but opposed by the Australian federal government and environmental groups.
Quick Facts Commonwealth v The State of Tasmania, Court ...
Commonwealth v The State of Tasmania | |
---|---|
Court | High Court of Australia Canberra |
Full case name | The Commonwealth of Australia v State of Tasmania |
Decided | 1 July 1983 |
Citation(s) | [1983] HCA 21, (1983) 158 CLR 1 |
Case history | |
Prior action(s) | none |
Subsequent action(s) | none |
Court membership | |
Judge(s) sitting | Gibbs CJ, Mason, Murphy, Wilson, Brennan, Deane & Dawson JJ |
Case opinions | |
(4:3) the Commonwealth validly prohibited construction of the dam, by virtue of the World Heritage Act (per Mason, Murphy, Brennan & Deane JJ) (4:0) any Constitutional restriction preventing the Commonwealth from inhibiting the functions of the States did not apply (per Mason, Murphy, Brennan & Deane JJ) |
Close