User talk:Zashaw
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hey Zasha, I don't know if you have the crcB RNA motif for one of your updates, but I have a couple of nice pictures for it, if you do plan on updating. Pjlmac (talk) 18:56, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello there Zashaw, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. BTW, nice work in the biology section. Cheers! --maveric149
Hiya, Zashaw!
Actually, believe it or not, I'm not actively following you around madly italicizing<g>, but species' names for some reason really bug me - my analyst says it's harmless. As for the method of italicization, my understanding was that wiki-style-markup is to be preferred to html-style-markup in cases where there's a choice. Of course, that may have changed, since I am now used to using it :) - or I may have been completely wrong in my understanding. At this point, sadly or not, I think '' can never stop being italic, since it's everywhere here! -- Someone else 05:26 Mar 22, 2003 (UTC)
- I sit corrected. Thanks. Plus it's nice to know people follow me around :-) Zashaw 21:22 Mar 24, 2003 (UTC)
- Following is so much easier when you sit still<G> -- Someone else 23:43 Mar 24, 2003 (UTC)
Feh! Are not major works of sculpture italicized?<G>...actually, it may be so, but I wouldn't dream of it without consulting a style guide! Lipstick (Ascending) on a Caterpillar Tread was a most bizarre sculpture - controversial mostly because it was unabashedly phallic in a way alumnae tend to object to - so when I saw Claes crop up on recent changes I just HAD to add it... Sadly, I don't know where there's a copyright free photo of it. - Someone else 00:12, 30 Oct 2003 (UTC)
Re: bioinformatics on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates#Nominations with unresolved objections, I have made some edits to the article in question which hopefully resolve some of your objections. Perhaps you may want to revisit this page. Cheers, --Lexor|Talk 03:30, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)