User talk:Securiger/Archive December 2004 - May 2006
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hi, you don't know me but you should know that a google search for [Coffield paradox] says in the first result summary that you have nominated the paradox as "original research". I don't think that is what you meant on the [VFD] page. The reason is that there is a wikipedia page ["nooks and crannies"] that advertises this position.Raazer 08:32, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)