User talk:Noyster/Archive 6
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
Erno Polgar |
---|
Erno PolgarDEAR NOYSTER! Many thanks your massage. My article draft: Erno Polgar. Can You clean and publish this draft? Yours truly: Eitan ben Avrohom — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.132.184.37 (talk) 09:36, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Dear Noyster! 1.My german language wikipedia page: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ern%C5%91_Polg%C3%A1r 2.my italian language page: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ern%C5%91_Polg%C3%A1r Can You see now is ok the references? Please to help me! 3. Comments about the author[edit] • "Erno Polgar hungarian writer is a notability person." [19] [20], famous jewish writer. Peter Weisz President http://barankovics.hu/az-alapitvanyrol/muhelyeink/izraelita-muhely BIMA Jewish Workshop[21] • "Erno Polgar is a famous contemporary person and writer" Dr. Aldred Schöner rector of the Jewish University (Budapest) http://hegedus.bzsh.hu/web/index.php/magunkrol/koerzetuenk-mveszei.html[22] • "Erno Polgar excellent person and writer." M/S Piroska Keri President of the Belletrist Association http://www.szepiroktarsasaga.hu/tagjaink/Polgár_Ernô[23] • Ernő Polgár is a well known writer in Hungary - has received for his anti racist principles - the Radnóti Anti-Racism Award 2014. The readers can find the different manifestations of the anti-Semitism in his works. Ernő Polgar's philosophy is, “the measure of the civilization are the respect for ancestors and humanism.” Tamas Barat (New York) President of the Radnóti Anti-Racism Award Foundation User:TomBarat http://www.demokrata.info/velemenyek-publicisztika/724-konyvegetes (Photo about Erno Polgar)[24] Ernő Polgár a broad-minded unbiased writer, he does not say more than he thinks. He does not fake it and try to make it appear, to himself or the reader, that there is a coherent and probable whole when there isn't, has new insights. He is natural skeptics and think of things from their reader’s point of view. He strives to explain, to make things a little bit clearer, to make sense of our world and tells a full story, roots out opposing viewpoints. Adrienne Vadon [25] (Vienna, Austria) https://www.xing.com/profile/Adrienne_Vadon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.132.184.37 (talk) 10:55, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi I did it. What do You think about it? Same time I wish to You a HAPPY NEW YEAR! Eitan ben Avrohom — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eitan ben Avrohom (talk • contribs) 15:10, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
""Dear Noyster""! Please to see the "new" article, after a lot of work. Yours sincerely: Eitan ben Avrohom — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eitan ben Avrohom (talk • contribs) 13:47, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Dear NOYSTER! Many thanks for You the lot of helps. Yours concerely: Eitan ben Avrohom — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eitan ben Avrohom (talk • contribs) 09:21, 3 January 2015 (UTC) Dear NOYSTER! What do You think about the "move"? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Erno_Polgar Which is the next step? Yours Truly: Eitan ben Avrohom — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eitan ben Avrohom (talk • contribs) 09:46, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
Dear NOYSTER! Thanks for all of helps! Now I would like to edit a photo about me. Can You help me? I made this photo: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ern%C5%91_Polg%C3%A1r Many thanks! Eitan ben Avrohom — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eitan ben Avrohom (talk • contribs) 13:48, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
|
constitucionMany thanks for your contribution to this article it was much appreciated Please can you review the recent edits made after your improvements to this page. Winkelvi doesnt appear to be interested in improving the article and instead seems to favour deleting large parts of interesting and viable information. Surely contributors should contribute at least equivalent of what they delete. Winkelvi seems to enjoy deleting others work. Citing reasons such as foreign language sources. Thank you in advance for your rationailty. 30/12/2014 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.222.243.182 (talk) 04:35, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Many thanks Noyster. Appreciate all your help and good work. As mentioned on the Constitucion talk page there is a mistake with regards to to the wood pulp plant which is still open. The Ramal is a type of narrow gauge rural train service and is the last remaining in Chile. Ramals were extensively constructed across the country funded by money from the saltpeter boom. They never made any money and therefore private enterprises never invested in the operations of these services. Private companies only operated services for coal and copper mines. All the other ramals closed as a result of government cutbacks. Constitucions Ramal stayed open as it was used slightly more a large impact being the workers for the celulosa (wood pulp) plant. The link I put on the talk page has amazing old photos of constitucion and the Ramal (the PDF). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.222.243.182 (talk) 12:42, 31 December 2014 (UTC) Noyster: please keep in mind that this IP requesting concession caused great disruption at the article, including IP hopping to escape detection, vandalizing my user space repeatedly, vandalizing articles I had recently edited, and is likely a long-blocked sock-master who has a history of vandalization and disruption. He is the reason the article and my user space are both semi-protected. Should we be rewarding his unwanted and disruptive behavior by editing the article at his request? Since there's no deadline in Wikipedia, surely his requests can wait until the article is no longer locked and he can once again attempt editing (hopefully this time in a cooperative, collegial, and non-disruptive manner). -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 14:56, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for all your positive constibutions and logical analysis of the situation. I think its important that we remember the ethos of wikipedia is not about pointscoring or individual battles, it is about providing trustworthy, quality information in a collabarative way. We should try and set personal differences aside in order to provide the best solutions for society as a whole. Wikipedia is a social project and correctly shouldnt be dominated by any individual, group or writers bias. I appreciate your diligence in supporting these values. With that in mind I would like to make reference to the deletetion of the section on Pedro Munoz. Sadly he lost his life trying to save as many people as possible from the island in the River Maule in the interim between the earthquake and the tsunami. Chileans view him as a hero and his story moved me. The article is here http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/americas/03/08/chile.sacrifice/ I urge caution when putting a personal matter above consideration for those involved in such a tradgedy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.9.4.163 (talk) 21:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Fair enough - Im sad that is how you feel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.11.38.0 (talk) 03:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC) |