Thompson v. Keohane
1995 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Thompson v. Keohane?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Thompson v. Keohane, 516 U.S. 99 (1995), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) does not apply in custody rulings for Miranda.
Quick Facts Thompson v. Keohane, Argued October 11, 1995 Decided November 29, 1995 ...
Thompson v. Keohane | |
---|---|
Argued October 11, 1995 Decided November 29, 1995 | |
Full case name | Carl Thompson, Petitioner v. Patrick Keohane, Warden, et al. |
Citations | 516 U.S. 99 (more) 116 S. Ct. 457; 133 L. Ed. 2d 383; 1995 U.S. LEXIS 8315; 64 U.S.L.W. 4027; 95 Cal. Daily Op. Service 8968; 95 Daily Journal DAR 15680 |
Argument | Oral argument |
Case history | |
Prior | On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
Holding | |
28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) does not apply in custody rulings for Miranda. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Ginsburg, joined by Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Breyer |
Dissent | Thomas, joined by Rehnquist |
Laws applied | |
28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) |
Close