Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon
2006 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon, 548 U.S. 331 (2006), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a state court did not have to exclude evidence that was admitted into court in violation of Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations.
Quick Facts Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon, Argued March 29, 2006 Decided June 28, 2006 ...
Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon | |
---|---|
Argued March 29, 2006 Decided June 28, 2006 | |
Full case name | Moises Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon |
Citations | 548 U.S. 331 (more) 126 S. Ct. 2669; 165 L. Ed. 2d 557; 2006 U.S. LEXIS 5177 |
Argument | Oral argument |
Holding | |
States could admit evidence against defendants even if the evidence was obtained in violation of the Vienna Convention. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Roberts, joined by Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito |
Concurrence | Ginsburg (in judgment) |
Dissent | Breyer, joined by Stevens, Souter; Ginsburg (Part II) |
Close