Saddler v. Republic
Legal case in the Republic of Texas / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Saddler v. the Republic, Dallam 610 (1844), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Texas which held that although more than one person must take part in an affray, at trial, one may still be convicted even if the others charged are acquitted.
Quick Facts Saddler v. the Republic, Court ...
Saddler v. the Republic | |
---|---|
Court | Supreme Court of the Republic of Texas |
Full case name | Hiram Saddler v. the Republic of Texas |
Decided | 1844 |
Citation(s) | Dallam 610 (1844); 1844 WL 3895 (Tex.Rep.Sup.) |
Holding | |
That although more than one person must take part in an affray, at trial, one may still be convicted even if the others charged are acquitted | |
Court membership | |
Judge(s) sitting | John Hemphill, Robert E. B. Baylor, Patrick C. Jack, William E. Jones, William J. Jones, Richard Morris, William B. Ochiltree |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Ochiltree |
Close