R v Oakes
1986 Supreme Court of Canada case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about R. v. Oakes?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
R v Oakes [1986] 1 SCR 103 is a Supreme Court of Canada decision that established the legal test for whether a government action infringing a right under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is justified. David Oakes challenged the validity of provisions under the Narcotic Control Act that provided a person found in possession of a narcotic, absent of evidence to the contrary, must be convicted of trafficking the narcotic. Oakes contented the presumption of trafficking violated the presumption of innocence guarantee under Section 11(d) of the Charter.
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
R v Oakes | |
---|---|
Hearing: March 12, 1985 Judgment: February 28, 1986 | |
Full case name | Her Majesty the Queen v David Edwin Oakes |
Citations | [1986] 1 SCR 103; (1986), 26 DLR (4th) 200; (1986), 24 CCC (3d) 321; (1986), 19 CRR 308; (1986), 50 CR (3d) 1; (1986), 14 OAC 335; 1986 CanLII 46 (SCC) |
Docket No. | 17550 [1] |
Prior history | Judgment for defendant in the Court of Appeal for Ontario |
Ruling | Appeal dismissed. |
Holding | |
Section 8 of the Narcotic Control Act violates the right to presumption of innocence under Section 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and cannot be saved under Section 1 of the Charter. | |
Court membership | |
Chief Justice: Brian Dickson Puisne Justices: Jean Beetz, Willard Estey, William McIntyre, Julien Chouinard, Antonio Lamer, Bertha Wilson, Gerald Le Dain, Gérard La Forest | |
Reasons given | |
Majority | Dickson CJ (paras 1–81), joined by Chouinard, Lamer, Wilson and Le Dain JJ |
Concurrence | Estey J (para 82), joined by McIntyre J |
Beetz and La Forest JJ took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. |
The Supreme Court established the Oakes test as an analysis of the limitations clause (Section 1) of the Charter that allows reasonable limitations on rights and freedoms through legislation if the limitation is motivated by a "pressing and substantial objective" and can be "demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society."[c 1]