Oposa v. Factoran
Landmark case in the Philippines / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Oposa v. Factoran?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Oposa v. Factoran, G.R. No. 101083, 224 S.C.R.A. 792 (1993), alternatively titled Minors Oposa v. Factoran or Minors Oposa, is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the Philippines recognizing the doctrine of intergenerational responsibility on the environment in the Philippine legal system. The case is a contributor to the development of international environmental law.
Quick Facts Oposa v. Factoran Minors Oposa, Court ...
Oposa v. Factoran Minors Oposa | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Court | Supreme Court of the Philippines en banc | ||||||
| |||||||
Decided | July 30, 1993 (1993-07-30) | ||||||
Citation | G.R. No. 101083 (224 S.C.R.A. 792) | ||||||
Case history | |||||||
Appealed from | Makati Regional Trial Court Branch 66: Minors Oposa v. Factoran (Civil Case No. 90-77) | ||||||
Ponente | Hilario Davide, Jr. | ||||||
Court membership | |||||||
Judges sitting | Andres Narvasa (Chief Justice), Hilario Davide Jr., Isagani Cruz, Teodoro Padilla, Abdulwahid Bidin, Carolina Griño-Aquino, Florenz Regalado, Flerida Ruth Pineda-Romero, Rodolfo A. Nocon, Josue Bellosillo, Jose Melo, Camilo Quiason, Florentino P. Feliciano, Reynato Puno, Jose C. Vitug | ||||||
Majority | Davide, Jr., joined by Cruz, Padilla, Bidin, Griño-Aquino, Regalado, Romero, Nocon, Bellosillo, Melo, Quiason | ||||||
Concurrence | Feliciano | ||||||
Narvasa, Puno, Vitug took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. |
Close