Old Chief v. United States
1997 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Old Chief v. United States?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172 (1997), discussed the limitation on admitting relevant evidence set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403. Under this rule, otherwise relevant evidence may be excluded if the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, misleading the jury, or considerations of undue delay, wasting time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. In this case, Old Chief offered to stipulate to the fact of a prior conviction, which was an element of the crime with which he was charged. The prosecution resisted this stipulation, arguing that it had the right to present its case in any manner it chose. In Old Chief, the Court applied Rule 403 to the particular situation presented by this case, and concluded that Rule 403 required the trial court to accept the defendant's stipulation to a prior conviction over the prosecution's objection.
Old Chief v. United States | |
---|---|
Argued October 16, 1996 Decided January 7, 1997 | |
Full case name | Johnny Lynn Old Chief v. United States of America |
Citations | 519 U.S. 172 (more) 117 S. Ct. 644; 136 L. Ed. 2d 574; 1997 U.S. LEXIS 298 |
Case history | |
Prior | Conviction affirmed by the Ninth Circuit, 56 F.3d 75 (9th Cir. 1995), cert. granted, 516 U.S. 1110 (1996). |
Holding | |
Where the prior conviction is an element of the crime charged, evidence of a defendant's prior conviction may not be admitted if the defendant is willing to concede to the fact of the conviction. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Souter, joined by Stevens, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer |
Dissent | O'Connor, joined by Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas |
Laws applied | |
Fed. R. Evid. 403 |