Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mohamed et al. v. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc., is a case brought by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on behalf of five victims of extraordinary renditions against Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc., which had provided services that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) used to perform renditions.
Quick Facts Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc., Court ...
Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc. | |
---|---|
Court | United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
Full case name | Binyam Mohamed, et al., v. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc. |
Argued | February 9, 2009 |
Reargued | December 15, 2009 |
Decided | September 8, 2010 |
Citation(s) | 614 F.3d 1070 |
Case history | |
Prior history | 539 F. Supp. 2d 1128 (N.D. Cal. 2008); 579 F.3d 943 (9th Cir. 2009) |
Subsequent history | Cert. denied, May 16, 2011 |
Court membership | |
Judge(s) sitting | Alex Kozinski, Mary M. Schroeder, William C. Canby, Michael Daly Hawkins, Sidney R. Thomas, Raymond C. Fisher, Richard A. Paez, Richard C. Tallman, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Consuelo M. Callahan, Carlos Bea |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Fisher, joined by Kozinski, Tallman, Rawlinson, Callahan, Bea |
Concurrence | Bea |
Dissent | Hawkins, joined by Schroeder, Canby, Thomas, Paez |
Close