Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Ass'n
1988 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Ass'n?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association, 485 U.S. 439 (1988), was a United States Supreme Court landmark[2] case in which the Court ruled on the applicability of the Free Exercise Clause to the practice of religion on Native American sacred lands, specifically in the Chimney Rock area of the Six Rivers National Forest in California.[2] This area, also known as the High Country, was used by the Yurok, Karuk, and Tolowa tribes as a religious site.
Quick Facts Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association, Argued November 30, 1987 Decided April 19, 1988 ...
Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association | |
---|---|
Argued November 30, 1987 Decided April 19, 1988 | |
Full case name | Richard E. Lyng, Secretary of Agriculture, et al., Petitioners v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association, et al. |
Citations | 485 U.S. 439 (more) 108 S. Ct. 1319; 99 L. Ed. 2d 534; 1988 U.S. LEXIS 1871; 56 U.S.L.W. 4292; 18 ELR 21043 |
Holding | |
The American Indian Religious Freedom Act of 1978 (AIRFA) does not create a cause of action under which to sue, nor does it contain any judicially enforceable rights.[1] | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | O'Connor, joined by Rehnquist, White, Stevens, Scalia |
Dissent | Brennan, joined by Marshall, Blackmun |
Kennedy took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. |
Close
The ruling is considered a key example of judicial restraint by the Supreme Court.[3]