Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc.
2001 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc.?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc., 532 U.S. 189 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court case decided in 2001. The case concerned a provision of the California Labor Code which allowed the state to withhold payment to contractors or subcontractors if found in breach of contract, without a specific hearing on the matter. The Court upheld the provision because the companies were still able to pursue a claim in state court.
Quick Facts Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc., Argued February 26, 2001 Decided April 17, 2001 ...
Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc. | |
---|---|
Argued February 26, 2001 Decided April 17, 2001 | |
Full case name | Arthur S. Lujan, Labor Commissioner of California, et al., v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Incorporated |
Citations | 532 U.S. 189 (more) 121 S. Ct. 1446; 149 L. Ed. 2d 391 |
Case history | |
Prior | C.D. of CA grants summary judgement to Respondents, G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc. v. Bradshaw, 156 F.3d 893, 898 (CA9 1998) (Bradshaw I), Ninth Circuit affirms C.D. of CA, rehearing after intervening Supreme Court case 204 F.3d, at 943 |
Subsequent | Ninth Circuit Reversed, injunction vacated |
Holding | |
Even though there is no hearing under the state contractual scheme, because plaintiffs can bring claims in state court, there is no violation of due process | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Rehnquist, joined by unanimous |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amends. VIX |
Close