Doe v. Unocal Corp.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Doe v. Unocal, 395 F.3d 932 (9th Cir. 2002), opinion vacated and rehearing en banc granted, 395 F.3d 978 (9th Cir. 2003), was a lawsuit filed against Unocal for alleged human rights violations.
Quick Facts Doe v. Unocal Corp., Court ...
Doe v. Unocal Corp. | |
---|---|
Court | United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
Full case name | John Doe v. Unocal Corporation et al |
Decided | September 18, 2002 |
Citation(s) | 395 F.3d 932 (9th Cir. 2002) |
Case history | |
Prior history | 110 F.Supp.2d 1294 (C.D.Cal. 2000) |
Subsequent history | Opinion vacated and rehearing en banc granted, 395 F.3d 978 (9th Cir. 2003) Appeal dismissed and District Court opinion vacated, 403 F.3d 708 (9th Cir. 2005) |
Court membership | |
Judge(s) sitting | Harry Pregerson, Stephen Reinhardt, A. Wallace Tashima |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Pregerson, joined by Tashima |
Concurrence | Reinhardt |
Laws applied | |
Alien Tort Statute |
Close