Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'n
2001 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Department of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Assn.?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Department of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Assn., 532 U.S. 1 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court case decided in 2001. The case concerned whether Exemption 5 of the Freedom of Information Act, which applies to "intra agency memoranda or letters", is applicable to documents within the Department of the Interior which discussed plans for the allocation of water in the Klamath River Basin. The Court held unanimously that the exemption did not apply.
Quick Facts Department of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Assn., Argued January 20, 2001 Decided March 5, 2001 ...
Department of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Assn. | |
---|---|
Argued January 20, 2001 Decided March 5, 2001 | |
Full case name | Department of the Interior and Bureau of Indian Affairs, Petitoners, v. Klamath Water Users Protective Association |
Citations | 532 U.S. 1 (more) 121 S. Ct. 1060; 149 L. Ed. 2d 87 |
Case history | |
Prior | 189 F.3d 1034 (9th Cir. 1999) |
Holding | |
Documents shared between the Klamath tribe and the Department of the Interior, which address tribal interests subject to state and federal proceedings to determine water allocations, are not exempt from the Freedom of Information Act. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Souter, joined by unanimous |
Laws applied | |
Freedom of Information Act |
Close