Darby v. Cisneros
1993 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Darby v. Cisneros?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Darby v. Cisneros, 509 U.S. 137 (1993), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that federal courts cannot require that a plaintiff exhaust his administrative remedies before seeking judicial review when exhaustion of remedies is not required by either administrative rules or statute.
Quick Facts Darby v. Cisneros, Argued March 22, 1993 Decided June 21, 1993 ...
Darby v. Cisneros | |
---|---|
Argued March 22, 1993 Decided June 21, 1993 | |
Full case name | R. Gordon Darby, et al. v. Henry Gabriel Cisneros, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, et al. |
Citations | 509 U.S. 137 (more) 113 S. Ct. 2539; 125 L. Ed. 2d 113 |
Case history | |
Prior | Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit |
Holding | |
Federal courts cannot require exhaustion of administrative remedies unless mandated by statute or agency rules. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Blackmun, joined by unanimous |
Laws applied | |
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701–706 |
Close