Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp.
1988 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp.?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp., 486 U.S. 140 (1988), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a federal court's dismissal of a civil action on the ground that it should be heard in a foreign court, under the doctrine of forum non conveniens, does not preclude the plaintiff from filing the same action in a state court that applies different forum non conveniens rules.
This article needs additional citations for verification. (December 2021) |
Quick Facts Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp., Argued March 30, 1988 Decided May 16, 1988 ...
Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp. | |
---|---|
Argued March 30, 1988 Decided May 16, 1988 | |
Full case name | Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp. |
Citations | 486 U.S. 140 (more) 108 S. Ct. 1684; 100 L. Ed. 2d 127 |
Holding | |
Because the District Court's injunction barring the state court proceedings is broader than is necessary "to protect or effectuate" that court's 1980 judgment dismissing petitioner's lawsuit from federal court, this case must be remanded for the entry of a more narrowly tailored order. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | O'Connor, joined by unanimous |
Concurrence | White |
Laws applied | |
28 U.S.C. § 2283 |
Close