California Retail Liquor Dealers Ass'n v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.
1980 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc., 445 U.S. 97 (1980), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court created a two-part test for the application of the state action immunity doctrine that it had previously developed in Parker v. Brown.
Quick Facts California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc., Argued January 16, 1980 Decided March 3, 1980 ...
California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc. | |
---|---|
Argued January 16, 1980 Decided March 3, 1980 | |
Full case name | California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc., et al. |
Citations | 445 U.S. 97 (more) 100 S. Ct. 937; 63 L. Ed. 2d 233; 1980 U.S. LEXIS 86 |
Case history | |
Prior | 90 Cal. App. 3d 979, 153 Cal. Rptr. 757 (affirmed) |
Holding | |
California's wine pricing system constitutes resale price maintenance in violation of the Sherman Act, since the wine producer holds the power to prevent price competition by dictating the prices charged by wholesalers. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Powell, joined by unanimous |
Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. XXI, Sherman Antitrust Act |
Close