Biraogo v. Philippine Truth Commission
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Biraogo v. Philippine Truth Commission (G.R. No. 192935) and Lagman, et al. v. Ochoa and Abad (G.R. No. 193036) are the two names of a ruling handed down by the Supreme Court of the Philippines which invalidated the creation of a truth commission tasked to investigate a previous president. The ruling, which was handed down on December 7, 2010, ruled on the two cases as consolidated petitions.
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
Quick Facts Biraogo v. Philippine Truth Commission, Court ...
Biraogo v. Philippine Truth Commission | |
---|---|
Court | Supreme Court of the Philippines en banc |
Full case name | |
Louis Biraogo v. The Philippine Truth Commission of 2010 Rep. Edcel C. Lagman, Rep. Rodolfo B. Albano, Jr., Rep. Simeon A. Datumanong, and Rep. Orlando B. Fua, Sr. v. Executive Secretary Paquito N. Ochoa, Jr. and Department of Budget and Management Secretary Florencio B. Abad | |
Decided | December 7, 2010 (2010-12-07) |
Citation | 651 Phil. 374 (G.R. Nos. 192935 and 193036) |
Ponente | Jose Catral Mendoza, joined by Mariano del Castillo, Presbitero Velasco and Martin Villarama |
Separate opinion | Jose Portugal Perez |
Separate opinion | Lucas Bersamin |
Separate opinion | Arturo Brion |
Separate opinion | Renato Corona |
Concurrence | Diosdado Peralta |
Concurrence | Teresita Leonardo-de Castro |
Concur/dissent | Antonio Nachura |
Dissent | Antonio Carpio |
Dissent | Conchita Carpio-Morales |
Dissent | Roberto Abad |
Dissent | Maria Lourdes Sereno |
Close