Barnett Bank of Marion County, N.A. v. Nelson
1996 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Barnett Bank of Marion Cty., N. A. v. Nelson?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Barnett Bank of Marion County, N.A. v. Nelson, 517 U.S. 25 (1996), is a Supreme court case that ruled that states could moderate national banks[2] if doing so does not prevent or largely interfere with the national bank's ability to exercise its powers. Later, in 2004, the OCC (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency) authorized its preemption rule[2] which declared that a national bank's ability to exert its incidental powers which include lending and deposit taking inhibited[2] state laws that obstruct, impair or condition” the business of banking."
Quick Facts Barnett Bank of Marion Cty., N.A. vs. Nelson, Argued January 16, 1996 Decided March 27, 1996 ...
Barnett Bank of Marion Cty., N.A. vs. Nelson[1][2] | |
---|---|
Argued January 16, 1996 Decided March 27, 1996 | |
Full case name | Barnett Bank of Marion County, N.A. vs. Nelson, Florida Insurance Commissioner, et al.[1][2] |
Citations | 517 U.S. 25 (more) 116 S. Ct. 1103; 134 L. Ed. 2d 237 |
Case history | |
Prior | Barnett Bank of Marion County, N.A. v. Gallagher, 43 F.3d 631 (11th Cir. 1995) |
Holding | |
The court said states could manage national banks[2] when “doing so does not prevent or significantly interfere with the national bank’s exercise of its powers" which is called conflict preemption.[2] | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Breyer, joined by unanimous |
Laws applied | |
Riege-Neal |
Close