Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Murphy
2006 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Arlington Cent. Sch. Dist. Bd. of Ed. v. Murphy?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Murphy, 548 U.S. 291 (2006), was a United States Supreme Court case about experts' fees in cases commenced under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, ruled that IDEA does not authorize the payment of the experts' fees of the prevailing parents.[1] Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg concurred in part, and in the judgment. Justices David Souter and Stephen Breyer filed dissents.
Quick Facts Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Murphy, Argued April 19, 2006 Decided June 26, 2006 ...
Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Murphy | |
---|---|
Argued April 19, 2006 Decided June 26, 2006 | |
Full case name | Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Pearl Murphy, et vir |
Docket no. | 05-18 |
Citations | 548 U.S. 291 (more) 126 S. Ct. 2455; 165 L. Ed. 2d 526; 2006 U.S. LEXIS 5162 |
Case history | |
Prior | Murphy v. Arlington Central School District Board of Education, 402 F.3d 332 (2d Cir. 2005); cert. granted, 546 U.S. 1085 (2006). |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Alito, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas |
Concurrence | Ginsburg |
Dissent | Souter |
Dissent | Breyer, joined by Stevens, Souter |
Laws applied | |
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act |
Close